The use of crop yield futures contracts is examined. The expectation being modeled here reflects that of an Illinois corn and soybeans producer at planting, of revenue realized at harvest. The effects of using price and crop yield contracts are measured by comparing the results of the expected distribution to the expected distribution found under five general alternatives: 1) a revenue hedge using just price futures, 2) a revenue hedge using crop yield futures, 3) an unhedged scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields, 4) an unhedged scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields and by participation in government support programs with deficiency payments, and 5) a no hedge scenario where revenue is determined by realized prices and yields and by participation in a proposed revenue-assurance program.

We draw four major conclusions from the results. First, hedging effectiveness using the new crop yield contract depends critically on yield basis risk which presumably can be reduced considerably by covering large geographical areas. Second, crop yield futures can be used in conjunction with price futures to derive risk management benefits significantly higher than using either of the two alone.

Third, hedging using price and crop yield futures has a potential to offer benefits larger than those from the simulated revenue assurance program. However, the robustness of the findings depends largely on whether yield basis risk varies significantly across regions. Finally, the qualitative results described by the above three conclusions do not change depending on whether yields are distributed according to the beta or lognormal distribution.

Viewing The Paper

There are two ways to view and print the paper:

1) The Economics Working Paper Archive at Washington University (EconWPA)

This paper is posted on the Economics Working Paper Archive (EconWPA) at Washington University. The paper is listed under the "Finance" section paper # 9612004 . The archive lists an abstract of the paper along with files of the paper that can be viewed and printed. The papers are posted in Adobe Acrobat (*.pdf) format, Postscript (*.ps) format, and in HTML (*.html) format.

Click here to access the EconWPA holding of this paper.

2) PDF Format

   Click here to access the *.pdf version of the paper ... OFOR9605.pdf

Note: you may have to download a free copy of the Adobe Acrobat Viewer to view the paper in *.pdf format.